Management for organizations Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Management for organizations - Research Paper ExampleThe five core principles of perplexity are planning, organizing, staffing, leading and controlling. This is usually a process which starts from organizing and ends in controlling. Planning entails the creation of strategies to achieve trusted goals. For instance, managers may be given a task of increasing the companys sales. In the planning, they should find oneself out what the most appropriate advertisement tool is to advertise with the help of media or to create a sales force team. aft(prenominal) planning, the organizing part commences. Organizing is the putting in place the strategies generated from the planning part. After organizing the managers ordain need a workforce to help them achieve their goals. The incorporation of the workforce is referred to as staffing. This entails training, recruiting and developing employees. After staffing, the managers should play the role of the leaders. With a plan in place and a work ing force in place, the managers need to be motivators and encouragers to their team. Controlling entails keeping track of the project being undertaken. This also includes correcting mistakes which may authorize in the course of the project. In controlling, a manager compares the goals settle for the project and the development of the project. This ensures that the original set of goals is achieved. Due to the analysis of the functions of management, the assessment process becomes easier since for every step of management the requirements are well known.The moment of proper management provides the best mode of analyzing its success. However, there should be an accurate process of determining whether or not a management strategy is successful. In analyzing the success of management, each principle should be canvas separately. This provides room for accuracy and enables to determine which principle is affected negatively. According to Kubiszyn and Borich (2010), devising an evalu ation plan for a management team requires the use of results the particular management has achieved in prior processes. The main problem when it comes to management evaluation is that the assessment results are usually not reliable and accurate (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010). If this happens, the manager may be advised to take on changes which will lead to